Tuesday, December 23, 2008

bond

I saw "Quantum of Solace" today. I had heard mixed reports about it - everything from "It was really good" to "It has no plot". So, I sincerely hoped as I went that I would not be sorely disappointed. I was not.

I suspect that most of the disappointment with this movie is due to its breaking with the Bond tradition in one notable way: it is a sequel. None of those in the last decade and a half (the limit of my Bond experiences) have been a sequel, and I don't believe I've heard of any others (correct me if I'm wrong). However, "Quantum of Solace" can only be viewed as a sequel - it is the natural progression of the plot present in "Casino Royale". If viewed on its own, it would be completely unsatisfying. However, remembering "Casino Royale", I found it to be a thorough, enjoyable and satisfying sequel - possibly one of the best sequels I've ever seen. Unless there was an immense plot deficiency in the part I missed when I had a bathroom break, I think the negative commentary I have heard is unfounded, and I recommend you watch it - but only if you have seen "Casino Royale" first.

No comments:

Post a Comment